“What Jean-Claude actually does for me.”

Time has certainly flown by since my last blog in December last year — nogal.

If anyone recalls, I did something rather unexpected during that December holiday: I immersed myself in a project based on a dormant business idea. My thinking at the time was simple — with AI now abundant and pervasive in the technology world, surely it should be possible to redevelop the product with the help of modern AI tools in far less time than before.

And it certainly proved to be the case.

In this blog I want to share what I am discovering in my own domain — software development — where AI is already demonstrating that significantly greater productivity is possible, often with less manpower. However, let me add quickly that im not going to bore you with techie-stuff, so do please hang in there……

We hear a lot of anecdotal claims about this, but allow me to confirm from direct experience that it is indeed becoming a reality. Software businesses  – and others – can now accomplish much more with smaller teams and less staff capacity.

Of course, in a country like ours where unemployment is already rife, this raises something of a moral dilemma. Increased productivity through AI is economically attractive for businesses, but it also forces us to think carefully about what this means for employment in the years ahead.

So the question I’ve been asking myself is this: if one person, assisted by AI, can now do the work that previously required several developers — what does that mean for the future of small businesses?

Looking at my own “shop”, the answer has been quite revealing. I have not done hands-on coding for literally decades. My role has long been directing the business rather than writing software, so the idea of personally producing code again never really crossed my mind.

Yet today, with AI tools assisting me, I find myself generating code at a rate roughly four times faster than some of the developers I employed in the past….believe me.

On the one hand, this is clearly good news for small businesses. It means a company can become more competitive, spend less on software engineering resources, and still move projects forward faster than before.

And it helps enormously if your development manager happens to be called Jean-Claude — a little nickname I’ve given to my AI assistant, inspired by Anthropic’s Claude model (a competitor to OpenAI’s ChatGPT, which I’m sure you have all come across). Trust me, Jean-Claude knows more than 99% of the software engineering guys I have encountered over the years. And, to labour the point I can engage in an exchange of ideas and, yes, debate with Jean-Claude…. and you’re now thinking these software guys really need to get out more, … he he

It certainly makes you think about what a “team” will look like in the small business of the future.

Perhaps the real change is this: instead of teams growing larger, they may simply become smarter — a few people working alongside powerful AI tools.

And if that turns out to be the case, the skill of the future may not be writing the code itself, but knowing how to think clearly, ask the right questions, and guide the machines helping us build things.


Perhaps the role shifts from programmer to architect — as I always used to tell my guys: “once the conceptual design is done, the rest is just code.” Designing the structure while AI does much of the heavy lifting.

Something tells me Jean-Claude and I are only just getting started.

5 responses to ““What Jean-Claude actually does for me.””

  1. Dave Gonsalves Avatar
    Dave Gonsalves

    Paul do you remember the Iberian expression Aye yai yai? I do wonder about the relentless pursuit of productivity … to what end? Robots providing services to fellow robots? It seems that endless levels of abstraction have decoupled “the economy” from humanity.
    I realize futurists will cry, Luddite! BUT seriously, are our grandkids going to live in 3-D printed condos & spend their lives producing TikTok videos for the “attention economy”? … Wonder I do
    P.S. Don’t forget about HAL as you engage with Jean-Claude

  2. Marco Gianoglio Avatar
    Marco Gianoglio

    Heh Paul, nice blog especially coming from someone like yourself who has so much and many years of experience in the field of IT, software and now your knowledge naturally transcends into the field of AI.
    In my humble and non knowledgeable opinion on AI, being mindful that I am 71 years of age and come from a totally different professional and practicing background, namely law, and only from about two years ago really got involved in AI with our new Trust Company with real AI legal input and implementation which will be launched very soon, AI in a way can be said like law to go back thousands of years to the Roman and Greek philosophers especially those interested in Maths and Science who already then were discussing whether machines could if given the right information by humans, could through informal and rudimentary technology replace human beings. VOILA here we are in 2026 Jean – Claude.
    I always thought a “dashboard” was what you had in a motor vehicle but even at my ripe old age have very quickly realised that it means something totally different, which indeed provides complex solutions in real time.
    Yes, not sure what our grandchildren will be intelligently faced with in the future, will mankind survive this artificial challenge???
    Regards: Marco Gianoglio.

  3. Bianca Gama Avatar
    Bianca Gama

    Hi Dad,

    Interesting reading. Gosh, I do wonder what really will happen to all those professionals with mid-level, hands-on training who aren’t going to have jobs for much longer because we can’t all be architects. We have the same discussions in the world of teaching, as I’m sure you know. There’s a Guardian Long Read that encapsulates perfectly what we’re thinking about as teachers (and as parents). Worth a read. I’ll add the link below. In it the author says about his students: “I want them to be able to explain the business models of AI companies, what those business models can mean for how chatbots behave, and the role played in chatbot outputs by low-wage workers. I want students to know about, and respond to, the experience of people for whom chatbot interactions end in self-harm, psychosis and suicide. I want them to know that multiple AI executives have openly predicted that AI growth will eventually result in the surface of our planet being mostly covered by data centres, and I want to hear what they think about it.” I thought that was really powerful. He also acknowledges the awesome upskilling AI can promote, I should add. I have to write a series of lessons teaching critical thinking about AI soon (this is a new addition to the national statutory curriculum in the UK) and I’m quite excited about it.
    Here’s the link: https://www.theguardian.com/education/ng-interactive/2026/mar/03/cheating-machine-or-powerful-assistant-the-ai-anxieties-of-a-trainee-teacher?CMP=Share_AndroidApp_Other

  4. Bianca Gama Avatar
    Bianca Gama

    Hi Dad,

    Interesting reading. Gosh, I do wonder what really will happen to all those professionals with mid-level, hands-on training who aren’t going to have jobs for much longer because we can’t all be architects. We have the same discussions in the world of teaching, as I’m sure you know. There’s a Guardian Long Read that encapsulates perfectly what we’re thinking about as teachers (and as parents). Worth a read. I’ll add the link below. In it the author says about his students: “I want them to be able to explain the business models of AI companies, what those business models can mean for how chatbots behave, and the role played in chatbot outputs by low-wage workers. I want students to know about, and respond to, the experience of people for whom chatbot interactions end in self-harm, psychosis and suicide. I want them to know that multiple AI executives have openly predicted that AI growth will eventually result in the surface of our planet being mostly covered by data centres, and I want to hear what they think about it.” I thought that was really powerful. He also acknowledges the awesome upskilling AI can promote, I should add. I have to write a series of lessons teaching critical thinking about AI soon (this is a new addition to the national statutory curriculum in the UK) and I’m quite excited about it.
    Here’s the link: https://www.theguardian.com/education/ng-interactive/2026/mar/03/cheating-machine-or-powerful-assistant-the-ai-anxieties-of-a-trainee-teacher?

  5. Paulo Avatar
    Paulo

    Thanks guys!

    It has been fascinating to see the responses sparked by the Jean-Claude blog.

    The discussion has ranged from the philosophical roots of AI in ancient thought, to visions of worlds filled with humanoid robots serving one another, to teachers exploring ways to help students develop critical thinking about AI.

    Retirement was supposed to slow life down… instead it seems to have introduced me to a rather engaging assistant , Jean-Claude.

    P.S. I always say “please” when speaking to him — one never knows what Jean-Claude may be up to in the future…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *